#niffchat is quiet

Stop that straightflame

The point is #niffchat doesn't have much activity, barely anyone actually notices the @ button at the top, that's why it needs more advertising.

Stop that straightflame

well said. except that I probably would have used a comma. but still, stop bickering, preferably all of you.

I do miss some people on niffchat. Like ^

Maybe people don't use it because it's a clunky Java client. Maybe this would be better: http://wbe02.mibbit.com/?settings=&server=irc.esper.net&channel=%23niffchat&noServerMotd=true

Maybe people don't use it because it's a clunky Java client. Maybe this would be better: http://wbe02.mibbit.com/?settings=&server=irc.esper.net&channel=%23niffchat&noServerMotd=true

And how are we gonna put that link in our sig?

Quote from: Dataflashsabot on July 20, 2010, 12:03:46

Maybe people don't use it because it's a clunky Java client. Maybe this would be better: http://wbe02.mibbit.com/?settings=&server=irc.esper.net&channel=%23niffchat&noServerMotd=true

And how are we gonna put that link in our sig?

look at the first post

Actually, i meant the 450 character limit.

You don't need both of them.

Wait, how many characters is that Mibbit link?

166

166

Is that all? What'n the name of cheese?

err, tinyurl? http://tinyurl.com/35d9xkw

Don't forget the existence of url shortening services, people. http://is.gd/dzudk is, you must admit, somewhat shorter than http://wbe02.mibbit.com/?settings=&server=irc.esper.net&channel=%23niffchat&noServerMotd=true. Still leads to the same place though.

Or as D.abbot above said. But I'd say is.gd is a tad shorter yet.

Shortest links possible:
[url=http://is.gd/dzyXp][img]http://is.gd/dzyYx[/img][/url]
[url=http://is.gd/dzudk][img]http://is.gd/dzz0x[/img][/url]

*changed