I've noticed that the topic is straying away from the rules. People aren't providing evidence to contradict a previous statement nor is the statement always false.
Please follow them more clearly, otherwise its just spamming, and those topics we usually lock.
For a reminder, here are the rules again:
Basics:
I make a statement -not a whole testimony, of course- that contains a contradiction (a lie you need to expose) and then the next poster uses made-up-on-the-spot evidence to prove i'm wrong. For example, if i were to say 2+2=5 and i have proof, the next poster should say something like ''OBJECTION! Youtube has lied! According to the one who proved it, it doesn't have to be true for people to believe it, it just has to be very complicated!'' And then he makes a statement w/ contradiction, and so it goes on. They were a bit vague about the rules on that forum, but the rules should be obvious. Oh, and it's it isn't also possible to contradict objections as well since a few posts, just so you know.