Reply #384
What huh?
It could be said that you realised that the Data vote wouldn't really go down well because it seems my argument wasn't that good. You unvoted because both my and your data vote is kinda suss, although yours can be construed as more bandwagony. What do you say to that?
(sorry that was very badly written)
Anyway
vote jimj
no, I unvoted because I suddenly realized I had made a mistake by thinking that he wasn't the one who kept trying to kill himself. I noticed when I read my earlier reply that said he was non-suspicious
because he tried to kill himself, so I realized that my vote was in error. I'm sorry, OK?
EDIT: all of the above is true, but now I realise that data is starting to look both suspicious and non-suspicious at the same time (somehow). and as much as I want to vote for somebody, it won't be him until this whole confusing mess is cleared up.
Jimj is still really suss we should lynch him at some point.
vote: Jimj316
SF, why did you just mindlessly agree with Lunar, and just vote for me without so much as a passing word?
PS. please, if you shorten my name, shorten it to "Jim" which is my real name, not "jimj".