to clear things up... i first voted for Lunar_Tick randomly... then a lot of time passed during the day and i honestly completely forgot about my vote... then Lunar_Tick asked me the question of who would be a better lynch than myself... which i took to be a question that needed a vote of reason and not random, as i first did... so i actually
looked for reasoning... and could only find that mochaalatte had not posted in a few pages... so i voted them (completely forgetting that i had already cast a vote)... i didn't stick to my vote of mochaalatte because to me i was only answering a question posed to me (it was my mistake for bolding their name and phrasing it as a vote)... then that leads to me sticking to my original vote of Lunar_Tick and my reasoning behind it... which originally was because i understood it to be that day 1 usually consisted of random votes... but i guess i misread that and that the first few votes generally are just random, not that the entire day consists of random voting... then after that... i gave my reasoning... which was due to his over posting (which i already know some of you hate, my reasoning that is, not his over posting)
On a more general note, over participating definitely is less voteworthy than under participating. Even if only 10% of what I posted was useful, that would be more useful postage than what one gets out of someone who is inactive.
It seems to me very illogical to actively vote out the largest poster because his or her posts are too large.
now 1st off, i'm a
her and secondly... i didn't realize there were specific "scum tells" i thought each individual was allowed to decipher and come up with their own reasoning towards other individual's actions... maybe i don't know how the game is played on this forum (not that i've played it on any other)... but i think its only fair that if i find reasoning behind something or someone i should be able to vote accordingly... and there really shouldn't have to be so many replies of "that is not a scum tell..." "this is more of a scum tell than that" "that's not suspicious enough grounds to vote someone" (and no i'm not quoting exactly so please don't start in on the "who said that then? can we please have a direct quote." lolz) unless the mod would like to list "scum tells" in the beginning of the game so that us new players can find something that the rest of you deem a valid reason to lynch.
and i do apologize for my defeatist statement... but i clearly can't just go "don't lynch me pweaaaze!"