Im saving my vote for Dataflashsabot for now because mostly something happens when he plays Mafia.
This post seems to explain why you haven't voted for Data. It gives the reason for withholding the vote on him because 'something happens when he plays mafia'. Quizzical, at least. Why would a proneness to 'make something happen' indicate scummyness or towniness? This question would be answerable if Peppy actually defines what she means by 'something happens'.
I think the assertion also tends to be wrong. I seem to remember me having to pester Data for being inactive quite regularly in earlier games. Although I may be mistaken.
That leads me to this: I find it queer that Peppy is metagaming. The first requirement for being even a halfdecent metagamer (which is pretty much impossible, as metagaming is pure conjecture) is being a veteran mafia player at this forum. Which I think she is not.
From past experience (little as it may be with her), Peppyhare is very much the Chaotic Neutral. In a game like mafia, it doesn't pay to give such players the benefit of the doubt or let them stay in the game longer at the expense of more useful but perhaps even more suspicious ones.
Ill change my mind when people are more suspicious to me
These are the utterances of a most classic Chaotic Neutral.
Rather, a player who either hasn't quite got to grips with the general concepts of mafia, or is purposefully being... chaotic neutral.
Why on Earth would others' opinions of a statement of yours directly influence it? The only case this occurs is if you are mafia.
I see this as a Chaotic Neutral tell rather than a scumtell.
Hmmm... Peppy, might want to avoid saying things like that, unless you really want to be lynched.
Out of pure interest in having more than one line of inquiry, what do you mean by that? What shouldn't Peppy be saying?
Kaizo wishes him to not say things like that. Kaizo's tone seems to imply that he wishes her to be silenced (at least for his own good).
His tone also implies that he's biased against lynching her, that he would rather have her shut up if she is scummy rather than scratch away at her scummyness until it is uncovered.
A townie should take a townie up for every action of said second townie that they see as scummy. As it is clear that you see at least some of Peppy's words at least somewhat scummy (I'm not sure if I agree, that's beside the point) you most definitely should be poking at those things you see as scumtells, not trying to tell Peppy not to say such things, even if it is for her own good. For all you know, she might be scum, right?
(Again if Peppy's actions are actually scummy is beside the point. I am talking about your response to a perceived scummy action as opposed to the response of a regular townie, the responses are most different).
Mochaalatte