Mafia 6 - OVER

Well, Salmoneous, that doesn't tell us what ROLE the inactive person had. The odds are 2:1 that it is town sided (see above post for logic behind this). What role do you think it is?

This makes no sense at all. Fos: Salmoneous.

You're either not paying attention or scum. Either way: FoS: Dataflashsabot

Well, Salmoneous, that doesn't tell us what ROLE the inactive person had. The odds are 2:1 that it is town sided (see above post for logic behind this). What role do you think it is?

There's really no way to tell at this point. Any guesses we could make would just be pointless, baseless conjecture.

I'm back!

(Not that much has happened).

Two quotes which stand out to me:

Also, it seems like they've got us going in circles, all pointing fingers at one another... whoever they are, they're pretty clever.

This "semi-praise" for the scum team looks like a minor tell to me.

Also, can we assume that one of the power roles is one of the least active players?

rolefishing = very bad.

I agree with the prods. If mafia can hide so easily among the town, it will be a lot harder for us to find scum.

Inactivity kills us! That's why the mafia killed Lunar.

@all, who would you be most willing to vote for now (I don't know is not an acceptable answer).

Right now? Probably Zetta, for, as I said earlier, trying to start bandwagons up immediately, almost as though he wants to progress the game to the night quickly.

Right now? Probably Zetta, for, as I said earlier, trying to start bandwagons up immediately, almost as though he wants to progress the game to the night quickly.

When did Zetta attempt to start a bandwagon?

I vote: Bored for role fishing, and avoiding questions.

Right now? Probably Zetta, for, as I said earlier, trying to start bandwagons up immediately, almost as though he wants to progress the game to the night quickly.

Excuse me? Bandwagons? I'm not trying to start bandwagons, I'm trying to encourage discussion and avoid entire days without posts.

I hereby retract the ~ in my Fo~S on Bored.

Sorry if that was unclear. It did seem to me like you were trying to start a bandwagon, but looking at the circumstances again, I realize you were just trying to get the discussion going again. And Razzor: I actually had so much on my mind when I was reading through this stuff I must not have noticed your question... I thought he had tried to start a bandwagon on D1, with Salmoneous, and D2, with his FOS immediately on Shawn, though I guess that I was being a bit hasty in my thoughts. As for role fishing: is it always a scum tell? Honestly, I'm just trying to find out who's mafia here, which obviously is a town sided thought... and also, Budja: what was with the agreeing with the prods? You seem to contradict yourself there, saying one thing, then saying something completely different. Why?

I thought he had tried to start a bandwagon on D1, with Salmoneous, and D2, with his FOS immediately on Shawn...

Oh, right, because my FoS is more suspicious than Budja's immediate vote. Seriously, what do you have against me?

I hold nothing against you. However, Budja's immediate vote does concern me, but this was the first time in the game, whereas you've been voting more than once. As for why I don't take much concern over one vote? Well, it's only one vote, and truthfully, I'm not worried about 1 vote, but it just seemed to me like you might have been trying to speed up the game, get a day over with quickly so you can go into the night phase, though I guess that you could be investigator as well.

Well, it's only one vote, and truthfully, I'm not worried about 1 vote, but it just seemed to me like you might have been trying to speed up the game, get a day over with quickly so you can go into the night phase, though I guess that you could be investigator as well.

I still don't see how an FoS says "I want to speed the game up" more than a vote does, especially considering that Budja's vote had little to no visible reasoning behind it.

That's me for you . I don't care so much about myself, but please, spare the other people! I guess that's just my personality. If Budja had voted for anyone BUT me, then I would've thought he was trying to start a bandwagon, especially with the little evidence he had. However, since it was for me and I don't really care what happens to me one way or the other, it's just a game, I didn't really feel like sticking up for myself. It's hard to explain, I guess, especially to any selfish people around...

Budja: what was with the agreeing with the prods? You seem to contradict yourself there, saying one thing, then saying something completely different. Why?

Eh? An active town is a good town. If the town lurk, mafia can also lurk with little consequence.

Now to address a misconception, at least in my opinion. Bandwagons are not always bad/scummy. If you believe someone is scum, it is not scummy to push their wagon. If you want pressure/explanations, start a wagon. Votes are our weapon, we are fools if we do not use them and a wagon need not always go to a lynch

...though I guess that you could be investigator as well.

More rolefishing.

I still don't see how an FoS says "I want to speed the game up" more than a vote does, especially considering that Budja's vote had little to no visible reasoning behind it.

Which vote would this be. I believe that I have a reasonable case against Bored now.
Also you are right, FoSes are weaker than votes.

That's me for you . I don't care so much about myself, but please, spare the other people! I guess that's just my personality. If Budja had voted for anyone BUT me, then I would've thought he was trying to start a bandwagon, especially with the little evidence he had. However, since it was for me and I don't really care what happens to me one way or the other, it's just a game, I didn't really feel like sticking up for myself. It's hard to explain, I guess, especially to any selfish people around...

Odd, if you are town, your alignment is the only thing you are certain of. If you don't care, you shouldn't have chosen to play, it may just be a game but that doesn't mean you can't take it seriously.

I remember when the culture here was to place votes randomly every day, we have got over that but now we are too paranoid, unable to scumhunt strongly or go beyond a FoS.
Find a place between the two.

@Bored, why no vote?
@Zetta, why no vote?
@all, why no vote?
I want to know everyone suspicious and opinions and I want to see a bit of pressure here not wishy-washy semi-speculation on who is scum.

Which vote would this be. I believe that I have a reasonable case against Bored now.

Sure you do now, but you didn't when you placed that vote. At least, I don't see it.

@Zetta, why no vote?

I don't really know. Bored seems suspicious, but my gut says he's not scum.

Vote: Bored2death

You can probably guess how much I trust my gut.

Baaamp.
Why is everyone so inactive? Get in here and answer buja's questions.