Shawnachu's post #51 is really weird and interesting.
First: Why so much conviction that if Limelemon or Salmoneous flips mafia, we should immediately go on and lynch the other one?
4. We lynch Limelemon and he's a townie.
Yes, we lose a townie, but we can guess that Salmoneous is a townie, as no one would defend someone for no reason.
Your argument is (and correct me if I'm wrong) that if Limelemon were town, he wouldn't possibly defend someone he didn't know to be town, therefore Salmoneous is town.
I think it has been demonstrated that Limelemon isn't even that sure about Salmoneous' role and is more pushing for neutral treatment of him, and not some kind of reactionary Zetta-style vote of him and that. His arguments, regardless of what he wanted to say with them, haven't really stood up, and he hasn't backed them up in his most recent posts.
So no, we can't assume Salmoneous is town if Limelemon is because Limelemon both couldn't know and doesn't know, at least not enough for us to 'guess that Salmoneous is a townie' as you put it. The fact that the theme of your post can be summed up by the opinion 'Salmoneous and Limelemon have the same role' seems to be counterproductive in the sense that it feeds this false dichotomy, which very well may suit the mafia down to the ground. If you do this consciously or not is a complicated matter, but it's clear you haven't really taken the time to look at other players.
First off, I said that Salmoneous seemed suspicious. I would lynch him, but since Limelemon's defensive of him, It'd be better off lynching him instead.
FOS and sceptre of quaint argumentation goes to Shawnachu.
Bored also feeds the stillness of the LL, Salmoneous (and to a lesser extent Zetta) status quo. He hasn't moved the game forward in any of his posts, and puts his vote, very dubiously, on Limelemon for reasons (asccording to Bored) previously stated. Not by him. This is not good.
Bored.More, later, maybe.