I'm kinda defending Salmoneous, yes.
[...]
So let me get this clear: Do you think there is a greater than normal chance that Salmoneous is town in this game? Are you defending the notion that we shouldn't lynch him, attacking the notion that we should, neither or both?
If you try to get something out of him, you are wasting your time.
Which is an adequately good reason to lynch him.
Your FoS on Razzorman also is dubious. You dole out a FoS for much less reason than Razzorman did.
Although this is a subjective statement, I think it can be seen that Salmoneous post (his reaction to the vote on himself) was an overreaction and not a defense. He resorted to exclamation marks, demagoguery and absolute statements which constitute overreacting and not reasoned defending.
The statement 'Salmoneous always behaves like this' has value only if the said typical behaviour was suspicious, in which case you could have a thing about it. If said typical behaviour is just being standoffish in D1 discussions, then it means just that. And that is a reason to go for a lynch.
Limelemon has left two questions by Budja unanswered.
Anyway.
Dataflashsabot.
If you have something better to base your vote/FoS off of, I hope you brought enough for the rest of the class do enlighten me.
This mindset for placing votes is questionable.
Does one place one's vote on the person who is most suspicious at the time and wait passively for more information to materialise, and when that time comes (if it does) just vote-hop?
Obviously, I'm taking that little stump and the beginning of the graph and projecting it way too long, but you know, it felt like it needed pointing out.
@ Salmonaeous, do you really think zetta is mafia?
Not wanting to sound like a mouthpiece for Salmoneous as I do, had he wanted to be as serious about his accusations as he seems, Salmoneous would have voted for Zetta already.