On Bored:Before I analyse quote by quote, I must say I found your post slightly demagogue-ey, although that might be your playstyle or something. I shrugged.
Is reason, then, a bad thing?
No, I didn't imply that, I hope.
What I meant is that your post (#10) could be either interpreted as a decent attempt at reason (in which case should be taken totally seriously, despite the fact that you didn't have many facts at your disposal anyway) or a quasi-random vote. It is clear now that it is definitely the former.
Had it been the latter, then you ignoring a direct question would be forgivable, since your FoS and arguments weren't taken so seriously. And that is my logic to back-up the statement:
I find the fact that you have overlooked post #11 intriguing, to say the least.
.
Which is a watered down accusation of suspicion/ignoring questions.
I actually noticed it cause a certain mafia game moderator pointed it out, and, indeed, when looking at your history, it was entirely different from your past style of game play.
Again, no idea what you're talking about. "It"? My history? Isn't my history entirely the same as my
past style of game play?
It was you I was thinking of, and it was voting for a pro town role that could lead to all of our demise. Notice, I am reluctant to vote on the first day, because I don't know who to vote for... the mafia are, no doubt, going to mess with our minds. [...]. Currently, I will remove my FoS in favor of gathering more information first [...].
Said demagoguery and filler rhetoric.
Also, you are acting like you have in the past again.
This contradicts with
[...] when looking at your history, it was entirely different from your past style of game play
this?
If you continue to act so... strangely... I may indeed consider voting.
Acting strangely isn't necessarily acting scummily.
This sentence implies that you find PP's actions up to now scummy, at least slightly. What do you find scummy in PP?
I think I know what role Purple is playing... a hidden role, the *cough* joker *cough* or is just trying to mess the game up...
Or maybe he has that strange thing called an awkward sense of humour.
On Data:Is your vote on PP totally and completely random? If so it is useless and of no value.
Let us assume it isn't such a random vote. Do you think that PP's strange behaviour is scummy for its strangeness or for something else? Or is it not his strangeness that made you vote?
On Salmoneous:Are you gonna say anything D1 or shall we count on your formulaic brevity?