On Purple Pineapple@Lunar: Ok. My reasoning is as follows: I didn't wan't any lynch just yet. If I didn't say I was using that as a diversion, you would've asked me why I was making an apparently random lynch. I had every intention of unvoting when Salmoneous drew too near to a lynch. If I voted for some random person, it would seem even more suspicious.
So you are telling me you think it is less suspicious to vote on a player about whom a very shaky D1 case has been made, exactly the kind which would lead to a quick bandwagon (and give no reason about it but anyway), than to vote randomly on some guy?
The first choice puts Salmoneous in a dangerous position (aggravating a bandwagon, etc), which you say you had no intention of doing, as you were gonna take your vote off. The second puts no player in a dangerous position.
I therefore don't think it would seem even more suspicious if you voted randomly.
I also think the least suspicious way would be to campaign normally against a Victor lynch with evidence and shizzle, not trying all this slightly underhand tricks.
If I didn't say I was using that as a diversion, you would've asked me why I was making an apparently random lynch.
If you did vote somebody randomly, I would ask why you were doing so, and your reason of trying getting the heat of Victor would be logical. Because by voting somebody purely by chance you don't have any ulterior motive. But you very possibly have ulterior motive by voting for Salmoneous, an easy lynch victim.
A townie also wouldn't be ok with putting their vote on someone if they didn't think that person was scum. I mean what were you planning all the guys at that time who were voting for Victor to go for Salmoneous? So did you think that Salmoneous was scummy enough to warrant a vote? Either way you answer this question is scummy. (this may be a false dilemma)
If you did think Salmoneous was scummy enough to warrant a vote then why did you give another reason for voting and why have you unvoted.
If you didn't think Salmoneous was scummy enough for a vote then you definately shouldn't have voted form him, neither should your plan of action have been to wait for everybody to pile on him and then take your vote of when things get messy, which is what your plan looks like.
What exactly was your plan?
Grumble. I just explained my reasoning to the Salmoneous vote. I stick by my FoS, though. Salmoneous still stubbornly refuses to accept that there are ways to vote on the first day.
I rather agree with this post to some extent. Salmoneous just needs to step up and discuss rather than hanging on a rather bad day 1 strategy.
Both of these quotes are just very short nutshells of the posts. You don't mention let alone dissect the problems with the arguments in either posts, which seems to suggest you have no problem with them. You don't actually take any new positions, nor is your view on Salmoneous clear to me. Is he scummy?
This all could be way too much hot air from nothing.
I want to hear Budja's opinion, I bet he's scum.