Koromi's post eludes me.
i'm not trying to say because it's the same person that did the outbursts in both occasions that it is more likely the circumstances are exactly the same.
i am saying that it is common strategy to try something more than once.
These two sentences seem to contradict each other.
In one sentence, Koromi says that we cannot claim that the two situations are similar (just because the two situations pertain the same person, LL).
In the other sentence, Koromi provides evidence that supports the claim that the two situation are similar (because the two situations pertain the same person, LL).
Is this some kind of strange rhetorical tactic, or?
Again:
and most importantly: lunar_tick, mafia is all about assuming, especially on the first day.
Reading this after reading the part of my post #45 on Koromi, it seems that he states an opinion and disagrees with me: that we ought to assume (generally) about things in the game, and also we ought to assume (more specifically now) that the two incidents of LL behaviour are similar, and should be treated as such.
I wouldn't like to comment more on this because, naturally, Koromi (among others) has to come in and sort it out, however I will say that the assertion
mafia is all about assuming, especially on the first day.
should not be held as a golden rule, as it possibly leads to a bad attitude. This bad attitude is essentially believing that in a game of Mafia you can't really have any tangible and proper evidence, so let's just go with our gut instinct rather than ask questions or try to obtain what we see as the impossible.