Backdoor.Agent.34

  • 8 Replies
  • 5466 Views
*

Offline Evil

  • 1116
  • 1
  • 1723
    • View Profile
Backdoor.Agent.34
« on: June 23, 2009, 00:26:16 »
I scanned it an it said it had Backdoor.Agent.34

I don't know...

I went to the jotti.org something something

*

Offline Dandelion

  • 428
  • 0
  • Yay owls!
    • View Profile
Re: Backdoor.Agent.34
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2009, 03:16:53 »
That's weird. Did you get it from the niffpage/link in the forum description? If you did then it's probably a false positive.

Check out my tilesets!

*

Offline Evil

  • 1116
  • 1
  • 1723
    • View Profile
Re: Backdoor.Agent.34
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2009, 03:23:18 »
That's weird. Did you get it from the niffpage/link in the forum description? If you did then it's probably a false positive.

link on the forum description

*

Offline Dandelion

  • 428
  • 0
  • Yay owls!
    • View Profile
Re: Backdoor.Agent.34
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2009, 03:46:42 »
It should be fine then.

Check out my tilesets!

*

Offline LPChip

  • You can only truly help other people by allowing them to fail.
  • 3431
  • 126
  • Excel at the thing you're the best at!
    • View Profile
    • LPChip Interactive
Re: Backdoor.Agent.34
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2009, 09:20:51 »
Some MMF applications get reported by AVG as virussus. I can assure you that there are no virusses, and that its a false positive.
on the left, above my avatar.

MODPlug Central Forum
"If I tried to kill you, I'd end up with a big fat hole through my laptop." - Chironex

*

Offline googoogjoob

  • Forum Walrus
  • 825
  • 9
  • The Walrus is me.
    • View Profile
    • I have a LiveJournal. Yes. I do.
Re: Backdoor.Agent.34
« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2009, 09:33:30 »
Incidentally, avast! has occasionally done stuff like this to me, too. A few weeks ago it decided KS was a Trojan of some sort and wouldn't let me play it. (Then I submitted a false positive report and with the next virus database update it was okay again.)
good bye

Re: Backdoor.Agent.34
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2009, 18:14:39 »
Kaspersky says, that programm is ok. But some others just "has not digital sign".
Maybe some antiviruses scold programms, that send any data(i.e. best time) to net?
just a human

*

Offline TechnoGeek

  • 238
  • 0
  • My new project, Notroid
    • View Profile
Re: Backdoor.Agent.34
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2009, 17:43:49 »
Kaspersky says, that programm is ok. But some others just "has not digital sign".
Maybe some antiviruses scold programms, that send any data(i.e. best time) to net?
having no digital signature means that the program is not cryptographically secured by VeriSign or similar organization.
Spoiler: Technogeek's Signature (click to show/hide)

*

Offline Firecat

  • 370
  • 52
  • Every bit is important.
    • View Profile
Re: Backdoor.Agent.34
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2009, 07:37:35 »
Ditto, i hate that Avast! dont let me put "Dont do nothing a DONT block becase i assure that i know what im doing"
There's 110011 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, Those who don't, and those who confuse it with ASCII.