LAYERS

Quote from: Bored2death on June 12, 2009, 05:58:15

WOW! Did you seriously ask that???

meenie D:\

I'm sorry... it just seems to be more of a common sense thing... to me, at least... plus, who's going to use 134227728 layers? And, how many would you make ground stuff, and how many objects? And, if you did use more than 7, think about how slow it would be. Put 5 or so white "explosions" on one screen, and that in itself creates serious lag. So, 134217728 layers would probably not even load on standard computers.

Quote from: Evil on June 12, 2009, 12:58:19

Quote from: Bored2death on June 12, 2009, 05:58:15

WOW! Did you seriously ask that???

meenie D:\

I'm sorry... it just seems to be more of a common sense thing... to me, at least... plus, who's going to use 134227728 layers? And, how many would you make ground stuff, and how many objects? And, if you did use more than 7, think about how slow it would be. Put 5 or so white "explosions" on one screen, and that in itself creates serious lag. So, 134217728 layers would probably not even load on standard computers.

it most certainly would not.

You people are taking jokes to serious...

You people are taking jokes to serious...

shouldnt it be the other way round? dont people usally muck around or is that just me 

You people are taking jokes to serious...

Hey, good, up to date sarcasm detectors are expensive.
And Evil, the quantity over quality joke is getting really old. Unless you really believe it, in which case it's quality over quantity for sure.

Don't you guys think this thread has gone too far from the actual topic?

It's already been explained why more layers will not be possible or should not be implemented.
No more to post ontopic? Then don't post