We got pwned again. Man, this is getting annoying.
=|=
AND AGAIN: I just tried to claim, but it said "too many people have edited that world" and that I couldn't claim. I'm e-mailing the guy again.Don't claim the world. It's better this way.
:huh: Everything looks fine.that's because I fixed it. Someone had made their sentence run long and it went through your Juni's face, and my Juni had been completely dizzolved in ramblings.
claiming is badI disagree. I'm working on a large structure, there's some awesome ASCII art, and there's some... interesting Juni porn.
it's much more fun if it's erased every once in a while so it doesn't become a huge mess (like it is now)
That has happened to me as well.
Also - may i propose that NOBODY edits ASCII art that are tagged with NO EDITING. I get where you are coming from monkey, but it's probably a good idea to leave them alone for a while before you edit them, so other people get a chance to see 'em
"Free-for-all" wasn't a big enough hint, eh?
- Keep it the way it is and add a disclaimer to the first post that it is indeed anonymous and everyone should accept this before contributing.
Well, just because you can draw a bunch of penises all over the place doesn't mean you should, nor does it mean that everyone should just accept it if it happened.I'm not saying everyone should suddenly be tolerant of ASCII phalli in any context, but that if they use World of Text, they should acknowledge it as an unpreventable possibility, and if they're too afraid to have their work desecrated, they can simply avoid using World of Text, or perhaps take one of the more complex routes of my second and third proposals.
However, if everyone just didn't do things they think others might dislike, I think it would be fine.I may or may not utterly despise it when people draw Juni without crossed eyes on World of Text. You all had better not do that anymore!
True that.Well, just because you can draw a bunch of penises all over the place doesn't mean you should, nor does it mean that everyone should just accept it if it happened.I'm not saying everyone should suddenly be tolerant of ASCII phalli in any context, but that if they use World of Text, they should acknowledge it as an unpreventable possibility, and if they're too afraid to have their work desecrated, they can simply avoid using World of Text, or perhaps take one of the more complex routes of my second and third proposals.
I may or may not utterly despise it when people draw Juni without crossed eyes on World of Text. You all had better not do that anymore!Well maybe I want to draw Juni's eyes the way I like them. That's no reason for you to change them to your preferred state.
Also, this right here doesn't cover the case of malicious world of text users: you can't stop malice by saying "we don't like that" because malice is when that is assumed (right?!), and it can't be enforced so there is no compelling reason to rethink and adhere to your guidelines.Yeah, but the only thing I remember being done with "malicious intent" was the trololo thing.
For that reason, i will no longer be posting any ASCII on WOT, but instead here (http://nifflas.lpchip.nl/index.php?topic=3219) (hopefully the mods will make an [ASCII] tag)
For that reason, i will no longer be posting any ASCII on WOT, but instead here (http://nifflas.lpchip.nl/index.php?topic=3219) (hopefully the mods will make an [ASCII] tag)That was a fast ASCII tag creation. :P
so like good luck writing the server side and stuff
It wasn't actually a serious suggestion...
YEAH! Keep on keepin on jimj!Status Update
1:...include a "Go To" function so I can go directly to an specified X-Y location.
2:Bookmark support...
3:select and copy entire blocks of text from/to the clipboard.
:D :D
awesome.
Does it download what others have written?
Also, I will not be able to do the server side code; however, I have devised an alternative that will work quite well until I can find someone who knows Python.
Allow me to explain how this works:
every time you leave a position in the world, the program (client-side) saves all the text at that position and the current time. when another person arrives at that position, they send a request to everybody online for the text. The person with the most recent copy of the text sends it to that person.
The program also sends live updates to everybody else while you are typing, and so all records are constantly updated.
oh, and one more thing; the program does not support continuous scrolling, like the original; instead, it uses screens like in KS.
so your alternative is a hack designed to work with someone else's server that doesn't support an efficient approach what
and there's no way to make it continuous!?
you do realize this is highly disadvantageous for ascii art or really any sufficiently large construction requiring details spread between screens right
Monkey, i can see where you are coming from, however i despise your negative attitude towards (almost) everything. Sure, point out the faults in the system, but realize that it is only a temporary solution, and that jimj isn't doing it just for himself, but for the whole nifforum WoT community. [/lecture]
Monkey, i can see where you are coming from, however i despise your negative attitude towards (almost) everything. Sure, point out the faults in the system, but realize that it is only a temporary solution, and that jimj isn't doing it just for himself, but for the whole nifforum WoT community. [/lecture]QFT
Monkey, ...bla... WoT community. [/lecture]You're the one with the attitude.
Hey, jimj, I've just thought of something... what about a "paint mode" in which you select a character and then start painting continuosly by using the arrow keys or clicking with the mouse? It would be like FSDPC (a REALLY old text-mode screen design program), where you could press ESC and a character, like the ASCII char 219 (solid block), and then just move the cursor across the screen while painting a line.
Can we still write Junipr0n fanfics, though?The stuff I got told to say was "no extreme or under-age pornographic content" so I guess that depends on how old Juni is. (good luck on finding that out, considering she's been every age from 4 to 976)
In that case, she's just turned 18. (http://sae.tweek.us/static/images/emoticons/emot-pervert.gif)Can we still write Junipr0n fanfics, though?I guess that depends on how old Juni is. (good luck on finding that out, considering she's been every age from 4 to 976)
The stuff I got told to say was "no extreme or under-age pornographic content" so I guess that depends on how old Juni is. (good luck on finding that out, considering she's been every age from 4 to 976)Well they probably meant cp. Loli should be fine. If you are outside of UK.
Uhh, what? Lolicon is only illegal in the UK.Wow. I can't think of a single worse way to defend that... Seriously, just... :sigh:
Oh, wait...The stuff I got told to say was "no extreme or under-age pornographic content" so I guess that depends on how old Juni is. (good luck on finding that out, considering she's been every age from 4 to 976)Well they probably meant cp. Loli should be fine. If you are outside of UK.
Yes, lolicon is illegal, and for a very good reason.Tell me your very good reason.
genomtänkt.Thought through is fine.
Tell me your very good reasonIt's about having sex with children. That's the very good reason.
CP/Pedophilia is illegal because people under 18 can't judge for themselves blah, adults forcing them to blah.
Loli is drawn characters. No one is harmed in the making of it.
It has many flaws (like that you sometimes, if the person is about 18 years, can't tell if the person is over or under).Well, you can always ask. :/
What you just said is akin to "Pedophilia is only bad if its rape."So are you saying that simply being a pedophile is bad? People can't control what they're sexually attracted to. You may want to rethink your logic. Unless you define "pedophile" as "someone who sexually interacts with prepubescent children," rather than "someone who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children." (And pretty much any sexual interaction with prepubescent children is rape, since they can't give informed consent.)