Wait, shouldn't we confirm that we got our roles first?uh-oh, this thread was to avoid the signup/confirm clutter...
I got mine.
I see. Well, then I guess its random voting time, until something happens.Wait, shouldn't we confirm that we got our roles first?uh-oh, this thread was to avoid the signup/confirm clutter...
I got mine.
I Fos myself as I'm a dirty rotten liar who can't be trusted. :shifty:ROTFL COPTER!!!!
@shawnachu, why do you suspect everyone?
2*66/94+42-75[(34+22)^(66*23)]=FOS-Limelemon, shawnachu, sabata(I HATE YA!!!) and... dataflashbot.Vote:Lunar_Tick. i'm sorry:(I Fos myself as I'm a dirty rotten liar who can't be trusted. :shifty:ROTFL COPTER!!!!
[offtopic]75th post!!![/offtopic]
Yeah-ah lets stop being random.If everyone votes randomly, there's a
On Battlehawk:
Your vote on Victor, I don't see why you have chosen him as opposed to the other three candidates you've picked. It seems unnatural or that you're just voting for the sake of voting or random voting, which contradicts the less random spirit of the rest of your post.
PS. The only real danger of random voting is bandwagons.Well, that and random voting so that some guy has four votes and then the mafia pile on him at the end and lynch him.
If you look closely I only FOSd Victor.Oh yeah, my bad.
And if anyone plays the "I can't keep up with the game, oh it's so hard and I'm so stressed" card I will kill them in the night, to put them out of their misery. Yes, I am looking at you Llewellyn.
Well, yeah, it is weird that he'd say that, but its too stupid to actually mean anything.And if anyone plays the "I can't keep up with the game, oh it's so hard and I'm so stressed" card I will kill them in the night, to put them out of their misery. Yes, I am looking at you Llewellyn.
that suggests to me that you are mafia or sk...
vote:Lunar_Tick
FOS:victor
What the... what exactly happened here?I think lime lemon could be jester because of the shear stupidity and unessecary nature of that comment (sorry if that sounded nasty). Of course maybe that would be too obvious.
vote:LimeLemon
Lynch anyone, I don't feel like I care much. OLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Well, yeah, it is weird that he'd say that, but its too stupid to actually mean anything.And if anyone plays the "I can't keep up with the game, oh it's so hard and I'm so stressed" card I will kill them in the night, to put them out of their misery. Yes, I am looking at you Llewellyn.
that suggests to me that you are mafia or sk...
vote:Lunar_Tick
FOS:victor
If you were mafia, would you say out loud that you are going to nightkill someone?
Still, there is the (very very) slight possibility that he slipped, so FOS: Lunar_Tick until we are given an explanation.
Also, I'd like to unvote.
I will Unvote, but keep my Finger Of Suspicion on Victor12, as he seems to be overreacting to me. :/Seeing as he just made one post, the craziness of which is little more than other posts', I think calling him out for overreacting is premature.
Next time, I suggest that the mod gives a subtle clue as to somebody's role that we can mull over.Wouldn't that ruin the largest part of the game? Actually, not ruin, but rather change the format and type of the game completely, which isn't bad, but it is unfair.
a deliberate outburst that is extremely noticeable, but removes all suspicion of being mafia. for this very reason, i put my finger of suspicion on limelemon.Eeee, I'm not so certain re Koromi.
Eh, if I might point out one thing to Battlehawk. Deleting/editing your posts is forbidden, even if it is something small.Yes, I did notice this earlier but forgot to post. In fact, the mod should consider retrieving the posts edited and posting them, and indeed modkilling.
I will Unvote, but keep my Finger Of Suspicion on Victor12, as he seems to be overreacting to me. :/Seeing as he just made one post, the craziness of which is little more than other posts', I think calling him out for overreacting is premature.
Exactly what is he overreacting to?
And if anyone plays the "I can't keep up with the game, oh it's so hard and I'm so stressed" card I will kill them in the night, to put them out of their misery.
Eh, if I might point out one thing to Battlehawk. Deleting/editing your posts is forbidden, even if it is something small.
I Cast my vote on Victor12. Not that I think he is the mafia. Nobody knows who the mafia is (Only the mafia themselves). On the first day we cant do any more then to vote out a random target.
And if anyone plays the "I can't keep up with the game, oh it's so hard and I'm so stressed" card I will kill them in the night, to put them out of their misery.
Oh, I can't keep up with the game! Will you kill me now, mafia?
I change my vote to Lunar_Tick.
Therefore I vote SalmoneousYour argument against Salmoneous is quite good, and I agree with it, athough I can't vote with you yet. I feel that some players have strange ideas about D1 (not saying they're necessarily bad) which kinda contradict the more regular approach for D1. So they might be townies who just have a different playstyle. Maybe it's me who's strange, which is why I seem to remember various D1 arguments about no-lynching, randomlynching et cetera. So yeah. Good points though.
I'm still FOSing Lunar because of his faliure to explain his previous outburst and more importantly some of his more recent comments which see a bit suspicious to me.I'd like to hear what other comments I made you find suspicious.
@ Lunar please explain your outburst at least. Its not like we'll forget considering that its recorded here for all to see. This shouldn't be such a problem if your innocent.I didn't want to say this, but I suppose I was shortsighted in thinking that I could get away with it. That comment I made was a tactical maneuver, killing two birds with one stone. To assure my longevity in the game, at least past N1 and to underline the point that some sentimental clap trap crap wasn't going to buy nobody another day this game*. Why do I need to stay in the game if I'm not a mafia? Well, being an arrogant shithead that I am, I feel I probably contribute more to a innocent victory than, say, Victor12. And, looking back at the past and noticing that I was targeted by the mafia two (three?) games running on N1, I felt that my longevity was anything but assured.
Did you read the super small text? It says:I know what you did was just a joke and can't be used to determine anything about you, but surely you understand that
Also, this was a joke, and if you think I'm suspicious because of this you're stupid.
I just said that to say something. Or start a discussion. I'm not trying to do anything, and I'm not claiming any role.
if you think I'm suspicious because of this you're stupid.is barely a defense, despite it being the truth. As well as the rest of your post. The second paragraph is very dubious.
Could it be that limelemon is the jester? Its the only way I can make sense of his strange behavior throughout the day.That actually makes some sense, given how odd his behavior is so far, and also his self-lynch.
He wants us to lynch him.
I Cast my vote on Victor12. Not that I think he is the mafia. Nobody knows who the mafia is (Only the mafia themselves). On the first day we cant do any more then to vote out a random target.now, that is a very odd thing to say, even on day one. voting for someone you don't know is mafia, then saying we don't know who mafia is, and finishing with 'can't do any more than to vote random target.' even though we can analyze other's behaviors and try to determine what they are.
Second, it seems victor12 is drawing a lot of attention despite posting once(?).Yeah basically we want him to address some issues.
a deliberate outburst that is extremely noticeable, but removes all suspicion of being mafia. for this very reason, i put my finger of suspicion on limelemon.Eeee, I'm not so certain re Koromi.
All that madness of LL D3 last game was pretty complex. I mean you can't just isolate and then look at similar behaviour and then assume it was the same thing.
Also, the outbursts are very different in character and spirit.
I just said that to say something.
Just "because" is not a good enough reason.I just said that to say something.
i'm not trying to say because it's the same person that did the outbursts in both occasions that it is more likely the circumstances are exactly the same.
i am saying that it is common strategy to try something more than once.
and most importantly: lunar_tick, mafia is all about assuming, especially on the first day.Reading this after reading the part of my post #45 on Koromi, it seems that he states an opinion and disagrees with me: that we ought to assume (generally) about things in the game, and also we ought to assume (more specifically now) that the two incidents of LL behaviour are similar, and should be treated as such.
mafia is all about assuming, especially on the first day.should not be held as a golden rule, as it possibly leads to a bad attitude. This bad attitude is essentially believing that in a game of Mafia you can't really have any tangible and proper evidence, so let's just go with our gut instinct rather than ask questions or try to obtain what we see as the impossible.
FoS victor, come out of the shadows :P.That is indeed rather out of the shadows, seeing as victor just happens to be the one lucky inactive to draw attention. FOS:Budja
@all who haven't commented, what do you think of Limelemon?It's seems like LimeLemon started by being random and people got suspicious of that. The majority of his remaining posts were self defense against koromi's accusation.
Victor12 just seems too silent; I doubt that lynching him would lead to any bad results.In total agreement.
Still, I'm not going to vote / FOS yet.Yeah, I'll vote after the next votecount.
And if anyone plays the "I can't keep up with the game, oh it's so hard and I'm so stressed" card I will kill them in the night, to put them out of their misery.
@ all you people not voting, why aren't you voting? Who is your suspect#1?Shawnachu. He has been pretty silent, and most of what he has said has just been following the crowd.
Unofficial Votecount
lunar_tick (3): purple pineapple, technogeek, Limelemon
Oh yeah, unvote unFOSThanks for the votecount, Budja. Even if it is wrong.
Salmoneous? He's the one that's been silent <_<
..and we're back to day 1, reply #3 tactics. FoS*2: SalmoneousSalmoneous? He's the one that's been silent <_<
I have already voted and I don't need to say anything more. What? You think Im the mafia because Im not making a load of replays accusing people for being the mafia without any evidence or theory? Just shut up and vote for someone!
Vote him or give me a really good reason why not to.
You three don't have any real evidence on victor12.
Salmoneous? He's the one that's been silent <_<
@Purple, FoS here, FoS there, but why no vote, eh?Because I'm not ready to vote for someone yet. No one has really struck me as suspicious. If anyone, I'd vote for LimeLemon, but he's got a good likelihood of being jester.
It is a non-standard role that is rarely used in mafia and the chance of a Jester being in this game is very small.What makes you say that?
FoS: LimeLemon
FoS*2: SalmoneousThis seems to suggest you found Salmoneous scummier than Limelemon :huh:.
I was saying that as backup for previous cases against Salmoneous.Quote from: Purple PinappleFoS: LimeLemonQuote from: Purple PinappleFoS*2: SalmoneousThis seems to suggest you found Salmoneous scummier than Limelemon :huh:.
i am just busy:<
anyway, unvote and Vote:koromi. he is silent too.
i am just busy:<
anyway, unvote and Vote:koromi. he is silent too.
[warning]victor is at L-1[/warning]*sigh* Indeed.
@victor, give us your opinion on the game so far. Prove your worth.You may be on hold awhile there.
vote: victor12Primarily, could you give your reasons for voting? It looks like you're voting because of Victor's silence, but, as you point out yourself, you are just as silent.
I have already voted and I don't need to say anything more.1. Yes you do. You can't just go around randomly accusing people. Discussion is vital to the town in mafia. It allows the town to root out mafia and avoid mafia tricks and bandwagons
What? You think I'm the mafia because I'm not making a load of replays accusing people for being the mafia without any evidence or theory?
I Cast my vote on Victor12. Not that I think he is the mafia. Nobody knows who the mafia is (Only the mafia themselves). On the first day we cant do any more then to vote out a random target.Not only do you baselessly accuse Victor from out of the blue, but you confess to the fact that you have no evidence and promote random bandwagons in your very next sentence. This is a direct and complete contradiction to what you said above.
Just shut up and vote for someone!3. This is, my friends, the final nail in Salmoneous's coffin. The red flag, the smoking gun. This is the damning evidence that will send Salmoneous's scummy rotting corpse to the grave. No one in their right minds would dare whisper what Salmoneous just shouted. If this and the evidence mentioned above doesn't scream mafia trying to discourage intelligent discussion and promote random bandwagons to divert suspicion from themselves and their cohorts then I don't know what does. Salmoneous's posts have been full of lies, contradictions, and telltale mafia rhetoric, and therefore I can say, beyond any reasonable doubt and with a clear conscience, SalmoneousI accuse you of being a member of the mafia and call on my colleagues to join me in condemning you to the hangmans noose. *que epic Phoenix Wright music*
There is no proof of who is the mafia since no night actions has been done yet. I could say that I am the mafia but nobody would know that. So, its the first day, just randomly vote someone out. Even if I will get voted out.
Think, what would the mafia do in the voting time/day.
STOP DON'T VOTE FOR VICTOR!!
DAANG I WAS TO LATE!
As for voting him off to get rid of so called *dead weight* I'd like to call your attention to mafia 3 where Igiari was voted off for the same reason and regrets were voiced about it later.
*thanks lunar for defence*Yeeeah... Crossed telegraph poles maybe. The only reason I'm not voting Victor is because I don't want the day to end before all the questions are at least partly resolved.
As for voting him off to get rid of so called *dead weight* I'd like to call your attention to mafia 3 where Igiari was voted off for the same reason and regrets were voiced about it later.I didn't regret it.
Discussion is vital to the town in mafia.Voting Victor at this point would hurt the discussion the least, wouldn't it?
Not only was that a gross overreaction [...]I think this is one of those cases of the pot calling the kettle African-American.
This is, my friends, the final nail in [...] the hangmans noose.Demagoguery.
Also a response to this would be appreciated.I'm still FOSing Lunar because of his faliure to explain his previous outburst and more importantly some of his more recent comments which see a bit suspicious to me.I'd like to hear what other comments I made you find suspicious.
Well, to draw attention away from victor, vote:Salmoneous based on previous reasoning.Why do you need to draw attention away from him?
As backup for what now who?I was saying that as backup for previous cases against Salmoneous.Quote from: Purple PinappleFoS: LimeLemonQuote from: Purple PinappleFoS*2: SalmoneousThis seems to suggest you found Salmoneous scummier than Limelemon :huh:.
Victor is being useless. [...]
The Igiari lynch wasn't that bad. [...]Your post (#109) seems to support a Victor lynch, or at least a Victor lynch over a Salmoneous lynch. You curiously write that post displaying all the information on the subject but I have no clue on your actual position on it. :P
Null, would be a reasonable policy lynch.
On Purple Pineapple:Because I don't want a lynch just yet.Well, to draw attention away from victor, vote:Salmoneous based on previous reasoning.Why do you need to draw attention away from him?
This comes off as a very weird post.
Admittedly, that was not very well phrased. I already said Salmoneous seemed scummy for a few reasons, and I was using that as backup for my point.As backup for what now who?I was saying that as backup for previous cases against Salmoneous.Quote from: Purple PinappleFoS: LimeLemonQuote from: Purple PinappleFoS*2: SalmoneousThis seems to suggest you found Salmoneous scummier than Limelemon :huh:.
I don't get this post. What do you mean you wanted to "backup" for previous cases?
OMG, you can't understand i do many things now like watching LPs on youtube, making a game in game maker, making a KS level etc. so now i go inactive. *thanks lunar for defence* *opens KS editor*
This is ridiculous.I daren't ask what you find ridiculous.
Think, what would the mafia do in the voting time/day....?
Because I don't want a lynch just yet.Hold on there. I know I would be a hypocrite of massive proportions if I accused you of deviating from the standard average townie persona but I will.
Admittedly, that was not very well phrased. I already said Salmoneous seemed scummy for a few reasons, and I was using that as backup for my point.Sorry, I don't follow. You were using "that" (what?) as "backup" (huh?) for "my point" (which one?)
1.) There's already been, what, 6.5 pages of reasonable discussion? And the first day isn't even over yet!6.5 pages isn't enough if we are not sure of our target. The mind set of sitting down to the discussion table as if it were a chore is very detrimental and usually brings the mentality of wanting to leave as soon as we've made our decision and as fast as possible.
2.) It's already been said many times, in previous mafia games and by other people that the first day can't generate much valuable evidence in weeding out the mafia.Yes it can. It is just very, very difficult to see it. The first day is the most valuable, one could say. It indirectly affects the rest of the course of the game and the actions during it are far from random.
so you'll just pop in here and there when your life is threatened?Indeed. However, I think we have a hot discussion going on, no need to lynch Victor yet.
that's hardly going to help the town find the mafia.
...I thought only Mafia can PM.so did I. Lunar, explanation?
Rules (Once again, thank you budja):
[...]
Nightly law:
You are fully permitted to PM people about stuff (kinda like calling a friend or something like that), but posting is forbidden.
Think, what would the mafia do in the voting time/day....?
Salmoneous, please expand on this. What do the mafia do during the voting time/day? And how do you suggest we play the rest of the game?
actually, Lunar_Tick is one of the best at analyzing people's behaviors, and is more helpful to the town. Commenting on every reply can help us make an educated guess on their role.Think, what would the mafia do in the voting time/day....?
Salmoneous, please expand on this. What do the mafia do during the voting time/day? And how do you suggest we play the rest of the game?
I havent said that. At least not in this game so dont try anything. But I would suggest you stop talking, your comment on every reply in the thread is a little annoying :P2
At Sabata, Purple Pineapple and Batlehawk:Let me just find those posts..
I want your views on Battlehawk's post #103, Sabata's post #105, my posts on the matter of supporting or opposing a Salmoneous lynch and anything else that you'd like to comment on.
Lunar_Tick unvoted; there's not enough to lynch Victor. 9_9Grumble. I just explained my reasoning to the Salmoneous vote. I stick by my FoS, though. Salmoneous still stubbornly refuses to accept that there are ways to vote on the first day.
There's hardly any reason to point to Salmoneous. Just because he wants the day to end is no reason to blatantly accuse him of being a bandwagonning mafia member. For one thing, it has already been shown that Victor12 is not going to be helping us in the townies' cause, and he's just dead weight. For another thing, you're being way too quick in denouncing Salmoneous for voting against Victor12. Salmoneous has shown the same (or at least very similar) behavior in a past game of mafia, was lynched, and then shown to be on the side of the townies.
If anything, I'd say that you may be Mafia (or at least an anti-town role) because of these arguments you're making!
1.) There's already been, what, 6.5 pages of reasonable discussion? And the first day isn't even over yet!
2.) It's already been said many times, in previous mafia games and by other people that the first day can't generate much valuable evidence in weeding out the mafia. Secondly, that wasn't an overreaction. What do you call LimeLemon's posts, then? They're not bad enough to warrant a vote, while Salmoneous' slightly sarcastic and reasonably defensive post is?
3.) Your argument is horridly unrealistic here. That's no reason to be so sure of someone's alignment; he just wants to get the day over with and get to nighttime so that there might be more evidence. He's acted similarly in previous games of mafia, and I quote:There is no proof of who is the mafia since no night actions has been done yet. I could say that I am the mafia but nobody would know that. So, its the first day, just randomly vote someone out. Even if I will get voted out.
Think, what would the mafia do in the voting time/day.
I'm going to unvote, not because your argument was successful but because there's now more people for me to be suspicious of, including you.
STOP DON'T VOTE FOR VICTOR!!!If, you do you may regret it terribly come D2! There are obvious mafia members among us who have started this bandwagon against him in order to divert attention from themselves. In my opinion when I accused Salmoneous earlier the mafia attempted to and succeeded in igniting a bandwagon against Victor to divert attention from Salmoneous. Victor's made 3 posts as of yet and in them there is almost no proof whatsoever that points to Victor being mafia. I believe that Victor may just be a bit of a noob to this, as 1 or 2 of you pointed out hes acted this way in previous games as well. As for his last post voting Koromi it strikes me as merely an amateurish mistake resulting from being out of touch with the majority of the proceedings of this game. As for voting him off to get rid of so called *dead weight* I'd like to call your attention to mafia 3 where Igiari was voted off for the same reason and regrets were voiced about it later. I wouldn't peg Victor as the sly crafty tactician the some of you seem to believe he is. In my opinion theres no doubt Salmoneous is the real scumbag here. All you have to do is look carefully at his posts to discover how alarmingly scummy he is. I will dissect them for you now:I rather agree with this post to some extent. Salmoneous just needs to step up and discuss rather than hanging on a rather bad day 1 strategy.I have already voted and I don't need to say anything more.1. Yes you do. You can't just go around randomly accusing people. Discussion is vital to the town in mafia. It allows the town to root out mafia and avoid mafia tricks and bandwagonsWhat? You think I'm the mafia because I'm not making a load of replays accusing people for being the mafia without any evidence or theory?
2. Not only was that a gross overreaction to Shawnachus simple prod at you for being silent, but it is also so horrifically contradictory it makes my head spin. For starters in contradicts what you said in sentence 1 and it completely contradicts your original post as shown below.I Cast my vote on Victor12. Not that I think he is the mafia. Nobody knows who the mafia is (Only the mafia themselves). On the first day we cant do any more then to vote out a random target.Not only do you baselessly accuse Victor from out of the blue, but you confess to the fact that you have no evidence and promote random bandwagons in your very next sentence. This is a direct and complete contradiction to what you said above.Just shut up and vote for someone!3. This is, my friends, the final nail in Salmoneous's coffin. The red flag, the smoking gun. This is the damning evidence that will send Salmoneous's scummy rotting corpse to the grave. No one in their right minds would dare whisper what Salmoneous just shouted. If this and the evidence mentioned above doesn't scream mafia trying to discourage intelligent discussion and promote random bandwagons to divert suspicion from themselves and their cohorts then I don't know what does. Salmoneous's posts have been full of lies, contradictions, and telltale mafia rhetoric, and therefore I can say, beyond any reasonable doubt and with a clear conscience, SalmoneousI accuse you of being a member of the mafia and call on my colleagues to join me in condemning you to the hangmans noose. *que epic Phoenix Wright music*
Note: Sorry if I got a bit caught up in the moment when I was writing #3. X)
@Lunar: Ok. My reasoning is as follows: I didn't wan't any lynch just yet. If I didn't say I was using that as a diversion, you would've asked me why I was making an apparently random lynch. I had every intention of unvoting when Salmoneous drew too near to a lynch. If I voted for some random person, it would seem even more suspicious.So you are telling me you think it is less suspicious to vote on a player about whom a very shaky D1 case has been made, exactly the kind which would lead to a quick bandwagon (and give no reason about it but anyway), than to vote randomly on some guy?
If I didn't say I was using that as a diversion, you would've asked me why I was making an apparently random lynch.If you did vote somebody randomly, I would ask why you were doing so, and your reason of trying getting the heat of Victor would be logical. Because by voting somebody purely by chance you don't have any ulterior motive. But you very possibly have ulterior motive by voting for Salmoneous, an easy lynch victim.
Grumble. I just explained my reasoning to the Salmoneous vote. I stick by my FoS, though. Salmoneous still stubbornly refuses to accept that there are ways to vote on the first day.
I rather agree with this post to some extent. Salmoneous just needs to step up and discuss rather than hanging on a rather bad day 1 strategy.Both of these quotes are just very short nutshells of the posts. You don't mention let alone dissect the problems with the arguments in either posts, which seems to suggest you have no problem with them. You don't actually take any new positions, nor is your view on Salmoneous clear to me. Is he scummy?
Ok. No, I don't actually find Salmoneous scummy.Really, after all the FoSes, FoS*2's.
Indeed. However, I think we have a hot discussion going on, no need to lynch Victor yet.QFT
The first choice puts Salmoneous in a dangerous position (aggravating a bandwagon, etc), which you say you had no intention of doing, as you were gonna take your vote off. The second puts no player in a dangerous position.Agreed, however I don't think Purple Pineapple thought that far ahead.
On Sabata:Well, yes, I agree. But I was pointing out that Battlehawk shouldn't be suspicious of Salmoneous just because Salmon thought that he didn't "need to say anything more."1.) There's already been, what, 6.5 pages of reasonable discussion? And the first day isn't even over yet!6.5 pages isn't enough if we are not sure of our target. The mind set of sitting down to the discussion table as if it were a chore is very detrimental and usually brings the mentality of wanting to leave as soon as we've made our decision and as fast as possible.
One doesn't need to be active to play, but one needs to be active to win.
Again, I agree. Actually, I'm not sure why I added that. I'm not sure what park of BH's post I was referring to. :huh:2.) It's already been said many times, in previous mafia games and by other people that the first day can't generate much valuable evidence in weeding out the mafia.Yes it can. It is just very, very difficult to see it. The first day is the most valuable, one could say. It indirectly affects the rest of the course of the game and the actions during it are far from random.
Whoever we lynch, the behaviour of the mafia N1 and D2 (and by extension the rest of the game) necessarily hinge on D1 actions and lynch, so D1 is, albeit indirectly and invisibly, the most evidence generating day in the game.
D1 also gives us direct evidence, but of course we won't be able to spot it right now. If we stir things up now, we'll be able to look back to D1 when a player starts getting very suspicious indeedums, and see in the D1 posts incriminating evidence in his posts.
DO NOT lynch me. *points to mafia 2*I AM a investigator. AGAIN.Why roleclaim victor? No, seriously, it isn't to an advantage for you regardless of whether you are town or not.
Isn't that a little hasty?You have to admit that victors claim was weird, and you yourself has made somewhat of a campaign to vote instead of FOSing to put more pressure on people.
Victor's claim was bad and un-needed but voting for a claimed Investigator for a policy lynch is at silly to say the least.
FoS: Sabata, Data
Also everyone should post their opinion of the claim before anything happens.
That's kinda suspiciousNo its not. Asking people to speak up is nothing but pro town.
Everyone who voted victor are stupidMind telling us why we are all flamboyant idiots, and why victor is so obviously town?
try to find the real mafia instead.As opposed to what? Thats exactly what we have been doing this entire time, and some think victor is the real mafia, or at least not helping the town.
That's kinda suspiciousNo its not. Asking people to speak up is nothing but pro town.
The more conversation going on, the likelier it is that the mafia will say something suspicious/illogical that we can use to find them.
I TOTALLY F-ING AGREE!!!
The first Mafias was the best ones. People voted instead of FoS and there was a 48 hour limit to a day I think. It was fun, back then. It's not fun anymore if you don't speed it up and stop discussing 9000 different things, ask for everyones opinion, and FoS all the time and unvote and even un-FoS I mean SERIOUSLY.
Thank you for reading this crap.
The first Mafias was the best ones. People voted instead of FoS and there was a 48 hour limit to a day I think. It was fun, back then. It's not fun anymore if you don't speed it up and stop discussing 9000 different things, ask for everyones opinion, and FoS all the time and unvote and even un-FoS I mean SERIOUSLY.And if that isn't suspicious..
Host your own game and impose a character limit on posts and a time limit on days. Start a trend.
And BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH.
Salmoneous seems the most suspicious at the moment, mostly due to continued inactivity.[/offtopic]
The first investigator attempted to investigate battlehawk, but was blocked.(Mafia prob know who it is!)
The guardian has decided to protect himself.
An attempt has been made to kill Limelemon, but has failed miserably.
Seeing how pitifully I failed, I guess this game's over.
I thought I could pull it off, but in the end, failed like a blob of waste. X(
I guess this is the end of my nifforum life.
I was an investigator, the one who investigated Salmoneous- and I got a 'guilty' result.Maybe he is lying in case the game goes on.
Explain please?
I was an investigator, the one who investigated Salmoneous- and I got a 'guilty' result.
You are a typical townie.
All you can do is vote and hope you hang the mafia. Victory is yours when all threats to town are gone.
On a hunch for now.Nope. And I don't blame you for voting me. I'd find myself quite suspicious now, aswell.
vote: Purple Pineapple
He apologised to me for defending victor and I feel this is quite odd. Did anyone else get a simular message?
This post just made me think of something. What with the night-time phone calls, everyone could just PM their role assignments from NES to each other. Whomever refused or sent a different town PM would obviously have a special role.I was an investigator, the one who investigated Salmoneous- and I got a 'guilty' result.
That's weird.
Here is the pm I received from NESQuoteYou are a typical townie.
All you can do is vote and hope you hang the mafia. Victory is yours when all threats to town are gone.
Why would I lie when the game is over?
This post just made me think of something. What with the night-time phone calls, everyone could just PM their role assignments from NES to each other. Whomever refused or sent a different town PM would obviously have a special role.Hence the rule against quoting mod PM's, nighttalk isn't really good unless it is a specific part of a role anyway.
I was the Jester. It's a really confusing role. :/Well, you fooled me. :D
...I was actively being inactive. :crazy:
And some of the old Mafias had an 'anonymous messages' thing- anybody could PM the mod with a message and the mod would post it publicly without mentioning who wrote it. Kind of the equivalent of leaving an anonymous note in the town square or something. Could be useful for investigators (and, of course, Mafia) to leave tip-offs.If cops can claim there targets without revealing themselves it makes them a lot more powerful.
I know I'll be a douche for saying it, but my plan as of N1 was a PP lynch with a major inquiry into Budja and the probably Budja lynch D2. Koromi was completely off my radar though.I knew I was attracting too much attention. (-:
Yeah, I overdid my defence of victor a bit. I thought you would be onto me after that.It's the mafia paranoia! :ohnoes: